(262) Response To The Statement 'Bad dreams are just dreams'

While you dream, your mind is reorganizing thoughts and sensual information that hasn't yet been consciously processed .  Your dreams are the manifestations of your subconscious.  They may reflect your fears, needs, or passions. 
When I was little, I had a recurring dream that I was a nail being chased by a floating hammer across a large field of quicksand in the dark.  The thought of that dream now still makes me feel a little bit uneasy.  I think that, as an adult the nightmares that affect one the most are those that are both logically possible and statistically probable - the ones which (if the events come true) would be abysmally devastating.
A 'dream come true' is usually just an accurate estimation of logical events based upon reinforced input - or, a representation of how truly surreal the world can be, if it reflects the strangeness of your mind.
If it's true that 'A dream is a wish your heart makes', then my heart has made some very disturbing wishes.

(261) Friendship

Most friendships with people rely heavily on how well you don't know one another.

(260) Love At First Sight

I used to think there might be such a thing as love-at-first-sight, then it occurred to me that it's structurally flawed as an idea.  It works well as a trope, a storyline, a quick finish to a long tale; but even idealistically it's bullshit.  Not like 'breakfast is an idea made up by the cereal companies' bullshit,  but in the fact that love isn't possible in a moment or without pretense.  Love is about growing with someone, and becoming better through respect, compassion, and loyalty.  And if it's not... if I'm wrong... if it's just some word created by Kellogg's to sell cereal at first sight, then fuck it.  What's it good for?
That said - yes; I do believe in love at first sight.  At birth.  It's a hormonal reaction in primate mammals that makes mothers care for their young.

(259) Snowy Spiderwebs

There's something very moving and majestic about witnessing a snow-covered spiderweb glistening in the morning sun like one giant snowflake and thinking to yourself: "If that spider's still alive somewhere he's having one hell of a shitty day."

(258) On the Watchmaker Analogy

It has been purported since at least the time of Cicero (before watches) that design implicates a designer and that if one were to find a watch somewhere one would conclude (with or without prior knowledge of the existence of watches) that it had been created by someone at some point. This is considered to be analogous to the idea that the existence of a complicated, functioning universe (which, itself, keeps time and is the basis of our idea of time - the Earth is actually a giant sundial) necessitates a designer.
What this argument is lacking is that if Man were to be theist and find a watch (or for that matter, a coke bottle, fire, etc.) and not have ever known what a watch was before, Man would conclude upon discovering its function that the watch was a sort of magic and wonderful gift from God. After the batteries/winder spring went out and the watch failed to continue keeping time, Man would conclude that the watch was some sort of demon trickery. After Man subsequently smashed the watch, he would discover that it had moving gears, sprockets, springs, and other parts inside and discover it to be a man-made, mechanical contraption. If Man were unable to repair or reverse-engineer the watch; he would shrug and say "the Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away."
If this is the case, then this proves that the nature of the Universe does not constitute a creator, but the nature of Man constitutes the need to create the properties of a creator (or else the structure of fallible argument is flawed). Either way, the creation and destruction of the watch are falsely attributed to God. If this type of thing is falsely contributed to God, then it's wholly conceivable that any idea of God as a creator, moralizer, or even as existent based upon worldly truth is falsified; and this falsification is a part of human nature.

(257) Failure Begets Failure

I want to know how many tax dollars go into investigating the cause of the crash of NASA's Mars Climate Orbiter. I understand that it's an unmanned craft and that NASA had just wasted $300+ million and two years of research; but what exactly do they mean when they say that they are going to investigate the cause of the incident? Are they going to invest millions more in a conversion calculator? The development team and navigating team seem to be blaming each other; but what if artists nouveau devised a conspiratorial plot to create abstract art on the surface of Mars?

(256) Chicken vs. Egg

Big bang theorists: The whole Universe was in a dense, compacted state and then suddenly began expanding and is still expanding. Oh, and somewhere in there chickens and eggs appeared (although not necessarily in that order)
Evolutionists: Dinosaurs crawled out of primordial ooze and were turned into chickens with some sort of insofar indeterminable link between the two.
Hegel: Chickens and eggs only exist in actual reality if they exist both in the mind and in the world.
Hesiod: Both chickens and eggs emerged from primordial chaos.
Judeo/Christian/Islamic: God waved His magic wand and said "Let there be egg!" and then from the rib of the egg created the chicken.
Scientology: Aliens sent tortured spirits here; some of which became chickens.
Buddhist: It doesn't really matter because it's in the past and doesn't so much benefit the present state of the existence of chickens or eggs as to justify the research needed to speculate on it.
Vedic: One God or all of the gods made The Universe out of another god or the same One God and evolution may or may not have happened, resulting in a sacred cow. The rest is shrouded in mystery by our pathetic day-to-day lives.
Actuality: probably something wholly implausible which, if physically witnessed, would be explained in different fashions by each different religious train of thought.